Real Estate Advisor Law Blog : Ohio Real Estate Lawyer & Attorney : Ulmer & Berne Law Firm : Columbus, Cleveland OH

In 2005 the United States Supreme Court in Kelo v. City of New London upheld the actions of the City of New London, Connecticut (the “City”) in forming a non-profit corporation to redevelop the Fort Trumbull area of the City. In order to capitalize on Pfizer, Inc.’s (“Pfizer”) private development of an adjacent research facility, the New London Development Corporation prepared a detailed development plan which included 115 privately held parcels. The Supreme Court upheld the City’s right to take the privately held properties in order to complete its development plan. 

Although the 5 to 4 decision was in line with a long history of Fifth Amendment eminent domain cases, it ignited a backlash throughout the country. 42 states enacted legislation placing further restrictions on the use of eminent domain for economic development. In Ohio, the Ohio Supreme Court held in Norwood v. Horney that the use of eminent domain merely for economic benefit violated the Ohio Constitution. The Ohio legislature also amended Ohio’s eminent domain law to make the “slum” and “blight” standards more stringent. Horney and the legislative changes tie the hands of government and swing the Kelo pendulum too far to the side of private property owners.

Although tax credits given to Pfizer were not a part of the Kelo litigation, Pfizer’s announcement last week that it would pull out of its research facility when its partial tax abatement ends re-ignited the discussion on Kelo. Those opposed to a public entity’s right to take property for private economic development point to the fact that, not only was the City’s plan never enacted, leaving the Fort Trumbull area vacant, but now Pfizer is leaving and taking over a thousand jobs with it. 

However, in urban areas, it is often impossible to complete any project of scale without involving private property owners. Often times these private property owners are able to hold an entire project hostage by demanding excessive values for their properties. Although the development in New London never came to pass, other developments which have civic value should not be permitted to die on the vine due to the self-interest of one property owner.  

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification by the U.S. Green Building Council is a certification program for the design, construction and operation of commercial and residential “green” buildings. Although the LEED certification program includes a neighborhood design component, one area not specifically addressed by LEED is landscape design. In an effort to establish a standard for landscape design comparable to the LEED certification for buildings, the Sustainable Sites Initiative—a partnership of the American Society of Landscape Architects, the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center at The University of Texas at Austin and the United States Botanic Garden in conjunction with a diverse group of stakeholder organizations—recently published the first set of national guidelines and performance benchmarks for sustainable land design, construction and maintenance. 

The ratings system works on a 250-point scale, based on achieving 15 prerequisites and a certain percentage of credit points. Achievement of 40% of the possible points equals a one-star level and achievement of 80% of the points equals the maximum four-star level. Points can be achieved for using vegetation to minimize building cooling requirements, providing opportunities for outdoor physical activity, and rehabilitating lost streams, wetlands and shorelines. 

Owners interested in minimizing their environmental impact and implementing sustainable design principles now have specific guidelines on how to do so with respect not only to their building, but the surrounding site as well.         

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

“Mixed-use” developments, which incorporate residential units with retail or other commercial uses, have steadily gained in popularity over recent years. This is due to the fact that mixed-use developments offer advantages to developers, owners, tenants and residents when compared to traditional single-purpose developments. Many of today’s home buyers are increasingly interested in living within walking distance of amenities such as restaurants, movie theaters and shopping. From the developer’s perspective, mixed-use projects provide diversification in the product they have to offer. Commercial owners and tenants benefit from having a built-in customer base and consistent traffic through their stores due to their proximity to the residential units.

The condominium form of ownership and governance is flexible enough to accommodate a mixed-use project, though it can also be combined with other forms of ownership for even more flexibility. The overall structure must be well-planned in order to balance the sometimes competing interests of the various uses. In a residential-only development, dealing with commercial uses is easy—the developer simply prohibits them in the governing documents. In a mixed-use development, however, commercial and residential must coexist peacefully. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways, but careful planning is the key to ensure that the “balance of power” between residential and commercial is maintained. 

One of the most important considerations in developing the ownership and governance structure is the physical layout of the development.  For example, will residential and commercial uses be located in the same building? If so, the developer and design professionals must pay close attention to access, noise and light issues, trash disposal and parking, among other issues. If the residential and commercial uses are located in separate buildings, the same issues often exist, but usually to a lesser degree. In a high-rise mixed use development, the parcel may sometimes be “horizontally subdivided” so that two separate condominiums can be created, one stacked on the other. Or, the ground level parcel may be a fee parcel used for a hotel, retail shops or other purposes with a residential condominium created from the upper parcel. In either case, a variety of easements for access, support and utilities will be required. Once the basic organizational structure of the development has been determined, the governing documents—usually consisting of one or more declarations, codes of regulations or reciprocal easement agreements—must be meticulously drafted to provide the easements, covenants and restrictions necessary for the successful operation of the development. 

Financing for a mixed-use development can also be complex, as funds often come from a mix of public and private sources, each with its own lending standards and requirements. Lenders may require that one or more portions of the project be held under separate ownership to minimize the risk of default. This is another factor to consider when planning the ownership structure of the various project components and the content of the governing documents.

Is mixed-use development just a short-term trend or is it here to stay? The International Council of Shopping Centers recently held a conference on mixed-use developments at which one leading developer told participants that mixed-use developments have gone from “novelty to normality” and that “[i]t’s been established that all of the other components—apartments, hotel, office—do better in concert with the retail component.” As the economy recovers and new real estate development projects take flight, expect to see mixed-use developments at the forefront.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link